Обсуждение:Карельский вопрос

Untitled

мдаа...))) пятница! --lite 12:21, 26 мая 2006 (UTC)

? -Kahkonen (об:Кахконен) 13:58, 26 мая 2006 (UTC)

В фи-вики мы убирам обсуждение где не обсуждать о статье... -Kahkonen (об:Кахконен) 15:41, 27 мая 2006 (UTC)

Здесь нет такого правила, может быть введём со временем. --ajvol 15:51, 27 мая 2006 (UTC)

Article 27

(Sorry, I must write this in English) The article 27 of the Paris Peace Treaty is completely irrelevant here. It deals with returning Finnish property that has been confiscated by the Allies because of the war. The Allied property confiscated by Finland is dealt with in article 25. Think yourself, does this make any sense: The Soviet Union wanted to return the property of the Karelians, but Finns did not understand it for 60 years. The some laypeople suddenly understood the 'real' meaning of the article. Neither any court nor jurisprudence accepts this interpretation. Kari Silvennoinen, the lawyer that has commercialised litigation about lost property, tried to prove it in his licensiate thesis but could not and he tries now desperately to keep this secret. --88.112.90.91 10:47, 22 октября 2011 (UTC)